Opportunity Thesis Sectors Portfolio Strategy Team Operating Model LP Rights Risks About Contact

Early-Stage
Australian
Hard-Tech

Where Australia’s advantages are greatest and institutional capital is scarcest.

Open to wholesale investors  ·  Min. A$200k  ·  First close Q4 2026
6yr
Track
Record
17
Portfolio
Companies
A$25m+
Deployed
3.1×
Blended
MOIC

The Right Country
at the Right Time

Australia possesses world-leading solar and wind resources, abundant critical mineral deposits and more than twice the arable land per capita of the United States.

Combined with world-class universities and strategic relationships spanning the US, China, India and South-East Asia, Australia is ideally positioned to be a global leader in the real economy sectors that will define the next century.

Yet Australia systematically under-invests in hard-tech innovation. Australians hold more than twice as much wealth in housing relative to GDP as Americans, and invest a third as much in venture capital. Australian hard-tech startups are significantly undervalued relative to global peers. This is the arbitrage Kapunda captures.

3×
More invested in housing vs VC
relative to the USA
⅓
Of US VC investment
as share of GDP
#105
Global economic
complexity ranking
Last
In OECD for
manufacturing self-sufficiency
The Kapunda Thesis

At the pre-seed and seed stages, Australian hard-tech startups face a severe capital shortage.

Kapunda invests early, builds conviction, and helps portfolio companies make the transition to well-capitalised US markets where valuations are materially higher.

Hard-Tech Is Hard.
That’s the Point.

Hard-tech startups are high risk. Unlike software startups which largely face market risk, hard-tech startups must also overcome technology, manufacturing, implementation and regulatory challenges. But, while failure rates are higher, the moats are deeper and power law dynamics dominate. Hard-to-do is hard-to-copy.

8/10

Of the world’s biggest technology companies drive significant revenue from hardware.

Alphabet Amazon Apple Broadcom Nvidia SpaceX Tesla TSMC
Portfolio Construction

Because hard-tech outcomes are more binary, the power law is more extreme. A small number of investments will generate the vast majority of returns. A family office making two or three direct hard-tech investments is not accessing this asset class. They are buying lottery tickets. A diversified portfolio approach is required to have a reasonable probability of capturing the outliers.

Sector Expertise

Underwriting technical execution risk requires a fundamentally different expertise than understanding the unit economics of enterprise SaaS. Generalist funds that make occasional hard-tech investments cannot build the pattern recognition, sector relationships or due diligence capability required to pick the winners. Focus is not a constraint. It is a competitive advantage.

Untapped Opportunity

The difficulty of investing in hard-tech is precisely what creates the opportunity. Generalist investors are deterred by technical risk, regulatory hurdles and manufacturing complexity. Those same characteristics are what generate outlier returns, but only for those that have the expertise to identify the winners and the portfolio construction to capture them.

Founders Who Thrive
on Hard Mode

Australia’s most capable technical founders are not building AI wrappers. They are rebuilding the real economy from first principles: in refineries, feedlots, substations and shipyards.

Purpose

No-one stumbles into battery anode materials, HVAC componentry or robotic hull grooming. Founders choose these problems because they are real, and because they think they can solve them.

Resilience

Australian hard-tech founders have less access to capital, fewer domestic customers and less government support. They are battle-hardened in a way their US peers are not and it shows in their ability to do more with less.

Our edge is finding these founders early and backing them with conviction and capital.

Three Forces.
One Opportunity.

Electrification of Everything

For the first time in human history, the cheapest way to create energy is not starting a fire. Solar, wind and batteries have made electrons the dominant form of energy, driving the electrification of transport, heavy industry, and HVAC as both economics and national security concerns accelerate the shift from fossil fuels.

The Physical Side of AI

The ongoing data centre build out represents the biggest CAPEX investment since the railroads in the late 19th century, placing unprecedented pressures on the construction and energy sectors. In parallel, low-cost intelligence is being applied to physical industries, triggering a boom in robotics and autonomy that will transform energy, heavy industry, and agriculture.

Increasing Geopolitical Complexity

The rise of China as a competitor to the US and the breakdown of the rules-based international order have eroded the reliability of globalised supply chains. Nations are rapidly re-investing in sovereign capabilities, with critical minerals, energy, and food security at the centre, and governments are investing heavily to accelerate these efforts.

“

International investors are investing in these thematics.
Domestic investors aren’t. Yet.

”

Why the Gap Exists

Australia systematically under-invests in hard-tech at the earliest stages due to four structural forces that make seed-stage hard-tech a difficult mandate for most funds to pursue.

No Breakout Success Yet

Australian hard-tech has not had a ‘Canva moment’. Without a landmark success to point to, it remains difficult to build LP conviction around the category, which creates a chicken-and-egg problem that keeps capital on the sidelines.

Chasing the Hot Sector

The Australian VC industry follows global trends with little regard for Australia's underlying advantages. As global hype has shifted from fintech to SaaS to crypto to AI, so have Australian VC funds, leaving segments like hard-tech unloved and under-invested.

Unsustainable Fund Economics

Small dedicated seed funds do not work for a traditional multi-GP partnership model. Management fees on an A$20m fund support one general partner at best. As a result, most funds either skip the seed stage entirely or make only occasional investments. Neither approach generates the deal flow, relationships or insights needed to source and diligence the best opportunities.

The Success Trap

Investors who develop genuine expertise in early-stage VC face strong incentives to abandon it. Strong performance attracts LP capital, which creates an opportunity to raise a larger fund with larger management fees, and write larger cheques into later stage rounds. The seed stage is perpetually vacated by its most successful practitioners.

The Result

Pre-seed and seed-stage Australian hard-tech startups are significantly undervalued relative to international peers. Kapunda invests early, at attractive prices, in a market with minimal competition for the best deals.

Where We Invest

Energy

Renewable generation, grid infrastructure, storage, and the full stack of electrification. Targeting the technologies that solve 'Gridlock': the challenge of storing and moving cheap electrons.

45%

Industrials

Advanced materials, robotics, autonomy, and industrial efficiency. Companies applying cutting-edge technology to sectors that have seen decades of underinvestment in innovation.

45%

Agriculture

Precision agriculture, supply chain innovation, and agri-biotech. Unlocking Australia's potential as the food bowl of the Indo-Pacific through technology-led productivity gains.

10%

Kapunda's three target sectors align directly with the priority areas of the National Reconstruction Fund (NRF) and the Clean Energy Finance Corporation (CEFC), the two largest pools of government co-investment capital in Australia. This alignment means that portfolio companies are able to access, but do not depend on, government capital in the form of concessional debt, guarantees and co-investment, extending runway between equity rounds and de-risking the path to commercial scale. See how our portfolio aligns with NRF priority areas →

Outlier Performance

Hard-tech returns follow a power law: a small number of positions generate most of the returns. We backed these companies before the market understood them. Now they are taking off. These rounds were not competitive because they were too technical for most investors to underwrite.

Sicona
20219.3×

Backed at seed in Wollongong. Sicona’s silicon-graphite anode material now sits in the qualification pipelines of Tesla, Panasonic and SAIC, with pre-feasibility complete on a first US gigafactory alongside Bechtel and a first IP licensing agreement signed.

Crux Group
20249.0×

Within two years Crux had deployed its first 60 modular battery sites across five Sydney council areas, on time and on budget, commenced energy trading, and secured approvals for a further 6,000 sites. The binding constraint on suburban storage was never the battery. It was permitting, and Crux engineered around it.

Phoenix Tailings
20216.0×

The sovereign supply chain thesis, validated by government capital at scale. In June 2026 the US Department of War’s Office of Strategic Capital committed US$500m in conditional financing to Phoenix, anchoring an approximately US$1bn initiative to rebuild American rare earth processing. Backed in 2021, when rare earth independence was still a policy paper rather than a procurement line.

Mako
20224.2×

Backed at seed in 2022, when drag-reducing riblet film was closer to a physics demonstration than a product. Four years on, Mako has closed an A$28m Series A with International Airlines Group investing directly, flies with Delta on the 767, and has flight-tested with the US Air Force. The market re-rated Mako at Series A. We were there four years earlier.

Infravision
20233.5×

Drone-based transmission line stringing, now operating across three continents: a multi-year MSA with Powerlink in Queensland, MSAs with Adani and Sterlite, India’s two largest private transmission developers, and operations established in the USA and Canada with PG&E and OPG. Commercial traction is accelerating faster than any other company in the portfolio.

On marks and liquidity. Unrealised positions are held at last priced round. Two positions have reached liquidity, and neither was our choice: an acquisition and a listing run to the market’s timing, not ours. Bueno returned 1.4× on acquisition in January 2026; Sea Forest 2.2× following its ASX listing in November 2025. Both were marked below the portfolio’s 3.1× blended average. Both returned capital.

The Full Portfolio

Past portfolio built through deal-by-deal syndicate model as one of two founding partners of Bandera Capital

Every company in the portfolio reduces emissions or resource intensity, not as a mandate, but because efficiency is good for business.

5B
Energy

Prefabricated, rapidly deployable solar arrays with superior energy density. Ideally suited to remote locations such as mine sites.

Year
2021
Location
Sydney
MOIC
TBC
Bueno
Industrials

Smart building analytics platform that monitors electrical equipment and automatically generates maintenance work-orders. Marquee customers include Woolworths, Disney and Google.

Year
2023
Location
Sydney
MOIC
1.4× (Exited)
Conry Tech
Industrials

World-first high-efficiency miniaturised chillers that reduce energy consumption by ~50% in commercial buildings and data centres.

Year
2024
Location
Melbourne
MOIC
1.4×
CounterCurrent
Industrials

Hyperlocal weather forecast for ships at sea, enabling AI-based routing algorithms that save more than $1,000 in fuel each day.

Year
2025
Location
Sydney
MOIC
TBC
Crux Group
Energy

Small modular suburban batteries: installable in days with no grid upgrades or council approvals required. 60 units deployed in Sydney and a further 6,000 sites secured.

Year
2024
Location
Sydney
MOIC
9.0×
DIT AgTech
Agriculture

Cloud-connected dosers on cattle water troughs enabling unprecedented consistency, precision and traceability in nutritional supplementation while reducing labour costs.

Year
2025
Location
Toowoomba
MOIC
TBC
Frontiers Market
Agriculture

AI-based machine-vision algorithms determining livestock weight to 98% accuracy using a standard iPhone camera, enabling real-time health and growth monitoring without manual weighing.

Year
2025
Location
Austin
MOIC
TBC
HullBot
Industrials

Semi-autonomous free-swimming hull cleaning robots that remove biofouling and improve fuel efficiency by up to 30%. Customers include SF Bay Ferry and Maersk.

Year
2025
Location
Sydney
MOIC
TBC
Infravision
Energy

Drone-based power line stringing and monitoring: cheaper, safer and faster than legacy helicopter-based approaches. Expanding across Australia, India, USA and Canada with Adani, PG&E and Powerlink.

Year
2023
Location
Sydney
MOIC
3.5×
Kanin Energy
Energy

Project developer connecting industrial facilities, EPCs and capital providers for waste-heat to energy projects, turning stranded thermal energy into a new revenue stream.

Year
2020
Location
Calgary
MOIC
4.8×
Leaptran
Energy

AI-based solar generation and demand forecasting enabling utility-scale asset owners to optimise energy trading. Selected by the US Department of Energy to pilot its F-AST tool.

Year
2023
Location
Houston
MOIC
TBC
Mako
Industrials

Drag-reducing riblet film that improves aviation fuel efficiency by up to 4%. R&D partners include the US Air Force, Delta Airlines, Vueling and Singapore Airlines.

Year
2022
Location
Sydney
MOIC
4.2×
Phoenix Tailings
Industrials

Clean low-cost electrochemical process for extracting and refining rare earth elements and enabling a secure sovereign mine-to-magnet supply chain.

Year
2021
Location
Boston
MOIC
6.0×
Rainstick
Agriculture

Electricity-based seed priming that creates faster-growing, more robust seedlings and increases harvest yields across agricultural crops.

Year
2024
Location
Cairns
MOIC
2.2×
RELA
Energy

Renewable land access platform providing regional landowners with market information, standardised documents and financing to unlock the value of long-term energy leases. Originated 2.5GW of projects.

Year
2022
Location
Sydney
MOIC
2.2×
Sea Forest
Agriculture

Seaweed-based livestock feed supplement that reduces methane emissions and improves feed conversion efficiency. Listed on the ASX in November 2025. Customers include Teys Cargill, Rangers Valley and Fonterra.

Year
2020
Location
Tasmania
MOIC
2.2×
Sicona
Industrials

Proprietary silicon-graphite anode materials that increase battery range by 20% and reduce charge time by 40%. Customers include Tesla, Panasonic and SAIC.

Year
2021
Location
Wollongong
MOIC
9.3×

How We Operate

Fund Size
A$20m
A$30m hard cap
Portfolio Size
20–25
Companies
Cheque Size
A$800k
Uniform, standardised
Fund Life
10 yrs
ESVCLP structure
Target Stage
Pre-Seed
/ Seed
Minimal competition
Target IRR
25%+
Net to LPs
Target MOIC
4.5×
Net to LPs
Mgmt Fee
2%
Annual, on funds committed
GP Commitment
A$2m
10% of target fund

Target returns are net to LPs. Fund model available on request.

Early-Stage Focus

Pre-seed and seed is where most venture capital value is created. It’s also where competition for the best Australian hard-tech deals is the weakest. Entering early maximises ownership, provides the greatest influence over company direction, and builds the relationships that generate the best deal flow. It is also where our networks and sector expertise are strongest.

Solo GP Model

An A$20m fund is unviable for a multi-partner firm but perfectly suited to a solo GP with the right support infrastructure in place. Solo GP structure enables speed, conviction and accountability in an asset class that rewards contrarian decision-making. It provides a mandate to back the “weird” and “difficult” hard-tech that institutional funds with consensus-based decision-making processes cannot. Supported by high-calibre Investment Committee, Advisory Board and founder network. How the Solo GP model works →

Nil Reserve Policy

All capital deployed upfront. No reserves held for follow-on. This maximises initial ownership (targeting 10%), eliminates signalling risk at later rounds, and creates a large pool of pro-rata allocations that LPs can access for direct follow-on investment.

LP Incentive Alignment

Fund designed to align GP and LP incentives and to enable LPs to compound exposure to the best companies in multiple ways:

  • •A$2m GP commitment: 10% of the fund
  • •Tiered carry structure
  • •Co-investment and pro-rata rights
  • •Right of first refusal on secondary share sales
Full details →
Streamlined Execution

Uniform investment sizing and standard deal terms for every portfolio company reduces legal cost and closing time for both parties. This both enhances Kapunda’s reputation and enables greater time allocation to activities which actually drive returns: sourcing deals, doing diligence and supporting portfolio companies.

High-Touch / Low Bureaucracy

No board seats taken. Advisory support focused on high-leverage network introductions and commercial discipline, not administrative burden. Enables prioritisation of companies that are succeeding and maximises time spent on activities that drive returns.

Early-stage venture capital is a high-risk, high-return asset class. A significant proportion of portfolio companies will not return capital and investments may take many years to generate returns. For further detail on Kapunda’s approach to risk management →

Jeremy Atkin

Jeremy Atkin
Founder & General Partner

Jeremy is an experienced early-stage investor who has built a portfolio of leading Australian hard-tech startups across the energy, industrials, and agriculture sectors as co-founder of Bandera Capital.

Prior to founding Bandera, Jeremy was a founding employee of the corporate venture capital funds of Lane Crawford Joyce Group and Woolworths (W23), where successful investments included Eucalyptus, Sonder and Samsara.

He began his career as a management consultant at LEK Consulting, where he developed analytical due diligence skills working on Private Equity transactions. He holds a BCom (Liberal Studies) from Sydney University with First Class Honours in Economics.

Jeremy is supported by an experienced team at Foxglove Capital, who chair both the investment committee and advisory board and act as an on-demand resource for investment sourcing and research.

On Impact
"Impact is not a strategy. New technologies are adopted to improve the bottom line, not for their environmental credentials. Impact requires scale; scale requires capital; capital requires ROI."
On Founders
"You back the jockey, not just the horse. At early stage, founder quality is the single most important criterion. Founders who are excellent and coachable are much more likely to succeed."
On Sales
"Founders tend to over-index on tech development and under-index on sales. Startups learn infinitely more from live commercial interactions than from a lab."
On Adoption
"Corporate inertia is real. Marginal ROI is insufficient. New technologies must solve a pressing pain point or drive ROI that moves the dial, and find a motivated, influential internal sponsor."
Investment Committee
MB
Matt Bungey
Fund manager & investment banker
LN
Luke Neller
Entrepreneur & engineer
PB
Paul Bennett
Family office investor & chartered accountant
RC
Rob Coe
Family office investor & investment banker
Advisory Board
GH
Gareth Hicks
Fund manager & security consultant
VB
Victoria Brilliant
Accountant & M&A expert
MK
Mark Kirkby
Family office CIO & accountant
LH
Lucinda Hankin
Family office investor & VC

Why Kapunda

This strategy requires a specific combination of skills, experience and relationships that Jeremy has spent a career building.

Sourcing

Six years backing Australian hard-tech founders has built a reputation that generates its own deal flow. Deals are referred by founders, friends and other funds. The best deals arrive through trusted relationships, not through a process.

Selecting

Jeremy has a proven ability to identify winners early, pricing technical risk that later stage funds avoid. A first-principles approach to technoeconomic due diligence honed over many years, backed by a network of subject-matter experts that generalist funds can’t replicate.

Supporting

No two startups need the same help, and what they need on day one evolves as they grow. Knowing when to lean in, when to step back, and who to connect a founder with at the right moment is a skill learnt only through experience. The support that matters most is helping founders get to the US, and this is something Kapunda is specifically set up to do.

What Founders Say

"Jeremy dives deep into the tech, gaining a more thorough understanding of the problem than any other VC we have dealt with, thereby giving him a greater appreciation of the significance and need for the solutions he backs."

Sam Ringwaldt, CEO
CONRY TECH · Industrials

"Jeremy didn't just write a cheque. He rolled up his sleeves and guided us through the messy jump from pre-seed uncertainty to an over-subscribed seed round. He added commercial discipline and real momentum, materially accelerating our march to climate-smart farming at scale."

Darryl Lyons, CEO
RAINSTICK · Agriculture

"Jeremy stands out as one of the very few Australian venture investors willing to back deep-tech breakthroughs at the earliest stage. His conviction in Sicona's vision, driven by rigorous research into our silicon anode technology, gave us the ability to accelerate our plans."

Christiaan Jordaan, CEO
SICONA · Industrials

"Jeremy backed us early with a deep understanding of the sector and a clear view of why we matter in it. He has been sharp, responsive, and easy to work with the whole way through."

Jason Weeks, CEO
CRUX GROUP · Energy
Fund I: Now Raising

Interested in
Investing?

Kapunda Ventures Fund I is raising A$20m to back Australia's best early-stage hard-tech founders. Targeting first close Q4 2026. Minimum commitment A$200k. ESVCLP structure.

Book a Meeting Request More Information
jeremy@kapunda.vc